Perceptii sociale diferite in ceea ce priveste aceeasi actiune
Sa luam sitatia in care Ioana este beneficiara unei situatii material decente datorita parintilor sai, ceea ce ii ofera mijloacele unui trai decent, insa nu ii satisface multe placeri ale vietii. Ioana lucreaza ca model de videochat doar pentru a avea mai multi bani sa isi satisfaca acele placeri precum a lua cina in restaurnate cu renume sau a-si cumpara haine de firma sau vacante exotice. Astfel, Ioana se dezbraca in fata camerei de dragul placerii.
O putem compara aceasta situatie cu Ana care se dezbraca in fata webcam-ului tot de dragul placereii dar intr-un mod uzual/cotidian, pentru a obtine intalniri, un barbat in viata ei, atentie pe Facebook, prin publicarea pozelor cu ea in care apare in lenjerie sau poate goala – deci atentia pe care corpul ei o primeste este ceea ce ii face placere.
Este vreo diferenta morala reala/palapbila intre Ioana si Ana? Atat Ana cat si Ioana se dezbraca/ating/folosesc de corpul lor de dragul placerii: amandoua sunt in cele din urma platite in placere.
Prezenta banilor ca intermediar in cazul Ioanei este inselatoare. Putem lua in considerare si situatia in care Ana ‘prinde” un mecaninc cu avansurile ei si niste poze in care apare gol-goluta, dar sexul cu barbatul in situatie nu ii aduce nici o placere sau chiar prezenta lui o plictiseste insa mecanicul respectiv ii schimba uleiul masinii personale.
Cred ca putem afirma Ioana si Ana au aproape acelasi sens al moralitatii/eticii.
Daca spunem ca : A te dezbraca doar pentru bani este imoral, atunci a te dezbraca doar pentru placere este la fel de imoral.
Insa voi fetelor, nu o sa va opriti vreodata din a va folosi de feminitatea/corpul vostru in mediul social astfel facand activitatea de videochat a fi ceva legal si moral.
Deci ar fi indicat sa ne lasati pe noi sa gasim placerea in mmediul online asa cum credem de cuviinta si daca sunteti invidioase, va puteti alatura noua sau va puteti cauta propria fericire pe Facebook.
“There’s only two reasons you hate gay people: 1) You’re dumb, or 2) You’re secretly worried that dicks are delicious.” (Joe Rogan) – ‘Sunt doar doua motive pentru care cineva ar putea displace persoanle homosexuale: 1) Esti prost, sau 2) In secret esti ingrijorat ca p****e sunt delicioase.”(Joe Rogan)
Comparatia intre situatii e exagerata, insa tot de prejudegati ne legam.
Deci ce alegeti?
Suppose Jane is the beneficiary of her parents money wich yields just enough money to live, but not to have much pleasure in life. Jane works as a camgirl solely in order to get more money to buy pleasures like fine dining and designer clothes. Thus, Jane undressed herself in front of a webcam for the sake of pleasure.
Compare this with Ann that undresses hersefl in front of a webcam also for the sake of pleasure but in a more ordinary way, to get dates, a man in her life, attention on Facebook giving/posting away nudes or lingerie pictures – so it’s the attention her body receives that she enjoys.
Is there any real/palpable moral difference between Jane and Ann? Both Ann and Jane are undressing/touching themselves for the sake of pleasure: they are both ultimately paid in pleasure.
The intermediate presence of money in the case of Jane may be a deception. We might also suppose that Ann traps a mechaninc with her advances and some well placed nudity, but she doesn’t enjoy his presence or the sex, but she will get a full oil change for her car in exchange.
I think we could say that Jane and Ann are close in their ethics/morality.
So we can say that undressing solely for money is wrong, then undressing solely for pleasure is always wrong.
But you girls, you’ll never stop promote your body in social media thus making webcamming a legit and morally sound activity.
So you should let us get our pleasure how we see fit and if you are jealous just join us or seek pleasure on Facebook.
” There’s only two reasons you hate gay people: 1) You’re dumb, or 2) You’re secretly worried that dicks are delicious.” (Joe Rogan)
So which is it?
